#CCSE22: Why Are Organizations Getting Zero Trust "Wrong"?
A star-studded panel discussion explored implementing zero trust and reducing overall risk
Zero Trust verifies each access request and limits privileges, reducing lateral movement after compromise through segmentation and continuous authentication.
Search across headline titles and summaries.
Background for this topic.
Zero trust is a security architecture that grants no implicit access based on network location. Each request is evaluated using the user or workload identity, device state, requested resource, and relevant context. Its purpose is to limit the damage from stolen credentials, compromised endpoints, or malicious insiders by enforcing least privilege and restricting lateral movement. Zero trust is a design approach, not a single product or a claim that trust can be eliminated.
Effective controls include phishing-resistant multifactor authentication, strong identity and access lifecycle management, device and workload authorization, application-level segmentation, short-lived credentials, and auditable policy decisions. Policies should limit access to specific resources and actions rather than broad network zones. Poorly maintained identities, service accounts, segmentation rules, or policy exceptions can leave exploitable paths while creating false assurance; the identity and policy infrastructure itself also requires hardening, monitoring, and recovery planning.
A star-studded panel discussion explored implementing zero trust and reducing overall risk
Stock the liquor cabinet and take a shot whenever you hear GitLab Staff Security Researcher Mark Loveless say “Zero Trust.”
One-in-ten respondents hadn't even heard of it Reader survey results When we published the questions for this survey, our view was that zero trust, or ZT, has finally begun to become a thing – as a real technology in real companies.…
Fredrik Hult, CISO at PagoNxt, argued that the "mother of all paradigm shifts" is here