Coverage of named threat actors and intrusion sets examines reported incidents, infrastructure, disruption, and defensive guidance.
Search across headline titles and summaries.
Background for this topic.
Coverage under this tag concerns a named threat actor or intrusion set: an individual, group, or organized operation assessed to be responsible for malicious cyber activity. Reports may describe incidents, malware, attack infrastructure, disruption efforts, or analyst assessments. Attribution is often provisional, so actor names and reported links should be treated as intelligence judgments rather than established identity, nationality, sponsorship, or motive.
For defenders, such reporting can help connect incidents and prioritize monitoring, but indicators and techniques may be reused or become obsolete. Validate reported infrastructure, hashes, and behaviors against local telemetry; use confirmed weaknesses to guide vulnerability remediation and access controls. If activity is suspected, preserve relevant logs and evidence, contain affected accounts or systems, and coordinate investigation without relying on an actor label alone.
Chinese threat actors are taking advantage of the poor state of edge security to breach both small and big fish.
The fresh-faced cybercrime group has been using nothing but publicly available penetration testing tools in its campaign so far.
After compromising Azure and Outlook user accounts, threat actors are creating malicious apps with high privileges to conduct cryptomining, phishing, and password spraying.
Threat actors are fully embracing the spin machine: rebranding, speaking with the media, writing detailed FAQs, and more, all in an effort to make headlines.