Coverage of named threat actors and intrusion sets examines reported incidents, infrastructure, disruption, and defensive guidance.
Search across headline titles and summaries.
Background for this topic.
Coverage under this tag concerns a named threat actor or intrusion set: an individual, group, or organized operation assessed to be responsible for malicious cyber activity. Reports may describe incidents, malware, attack infrastructure, disruption efforts, or analyst assessments. Attribution is often provisional, so actor names and reported links should be treated as intelligence judgments rather than established identity, nationality, sponsorship, or motive.
For defenders, such reporting can help connect incidents and prioritize monitoring, but indicators and techniques may be reused or become obsolete. Validate reported infrastructure, hashes, and behaviors against local telemetry; use confirmed weaknesses to guide vulnerability remediation and access controls. If activity is suspected, preserve relevant logs and evidence, contain affected accounts or systems, and coordinate investigation without relying on an actor label alone.
Though reports say this latest Ivanti bug is being exploited, it's unclear exactly how threat actors are using it.
A panel of CISOs acknowledged that artificial intelligence has boosted the capabilities of threat actors, but enterprise defenders are actually benefiting more from the technology.
Just like you and me, cyberattackers returned from winter break and immediately started sending thousands of emails.
WoS cybersecurity creates a united front for governments to defend against threat actors, harden security postures, and protect constituents who depend on services.