Coverage of named threat actors and intrusion sets examines reported incidents, infrastructure, disruption, and defensive guidance.
Search across headline titles and summaries.
Background for this topic.
Coverage under this tag concerns a named threat actor or intrusion set: an individual, group, or organized operation assessed to be responsible for malicious cyber activity. Reports may describe incidents, malware, attack infrastructure, disruption efforts, or analyst assessments. Attribution is often provisional, so actor names and reported links should be treated as intelligence judgments rather than established identity, nationality, sponsorship, or motive.
For defenders, such reporting can help connect incidents and prioritize monitoring, but indicators and techniques may be reused or become obsolete. Validate reported infrastructure, hashes, and behaviors against local telemetry; use confirmed weaknesses to guide vulnerability remediation and access controls. If activity is suspected, preserve relevant logs and evidence, contain affected accounts or systems, and coordinate investigation without relying on an actor label alone.
Goodbye, PHOSPHORUS! Hello, Mint Sandstorm. Microsoft adopts two-word monikers for threat groups, but do we really need more?
As threat actors around the world grow and evolve, APTs from the DPRK stand out for their spread and variety of targets.
An old threat actor is making its comeback, sending around their old malware with a new tint.
The Iranian threat actor displays activity similar to that of other advanced persistent threat groups.