What Communications Companies Need to Know Before Q-Day
NIST standardized three algorithms for post-quantum cryptography. What does that mean for the information and communications technology (ICT) industry?
NIST publishes cybersecurity standards and guidance that organizations use to assess risk, strengthen controls, and improve resilience.
Search across headline titles and summaries.
Background for this topic.
NIST is the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, a Commerce Department agency that develops technical standards, measurements, and cybersecurity guidance. Practitioners use the Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) to organize security outcomes, the SP 800 series for controls and practices, and the Risk Management Framework (RMF) to assess and authorize information systems. NIST guidance is generally voluntary for private organizations; particular standards can become mandatory for federal systems through law, regulation, or contract.
NIST gives security teams a common vocabulary for assessing gaps, selecting safeguards, and documenting risk decisions across the security lifecycle. Its publications address areas including authentication, incident handling, privacy, secure software development, and supply-chain risk. NIST’s National Vulnerability Database supports vulnerability management, but its entries and severity scores require validation against an organization’s assets, exposure, and exploitability. News under this tag may concern a draft, revision, or federal requirement, so practitioners should check the document’s version and applicability before treating guidance as a required control.
NIST standardized three algorithms for post-quantum cryptography. What does that mean for the information and communications technology (ICT) industry?
Logjam 'hurting infosec processes world over' one expert tells us as US body blows its own Sept deadline NIST has made some progress clearing its backlog of security vulnerability reports to process – though it's not quite on target as hoped.…
Fall is in the air and frameworks for mitigating AI risk are dropping like leaves onto policymakers’ desks. From California’s SB 1047 bill and NIST’s model-testing deal with OpenAI and Anthropic to REAIM’s blueprint for military AI governance, AI regulation is proving to be a hot and complicated topic.